Cinnamon Stillwell Ping
FReepMail me if you want on, or off this low-volume Ping list.
Posted on 12/17/2008 11:37:54 AM PST by SmithL
It was often said after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, that everything had changed. And for a few years afterwards, indeed it had. After decades of denial, America and its allies went on the offensive against Islamic terrorism, both militarily and morally. Most importantly, there was no hesitancy to name the enemy or to condemn his inhumanity.
But if the lack of outrage over the Islamic terrorist assault on Mumbai, India last month was any indication, everything has changed back.
The obfuscation that characterized much of the early reporting on Mumbai is partially to blame. Watching a number of television reporters go through visible pains not to use the word "terrorist" to describe a four-day reign of terror that would eventually kill more than 170 people and injure hundreds was a surreal spectacle. Initial articles described "militants," "gunmen," and "extremists," but rarely terrorists, and rarer still, Islamic terrorists. So-called experts prattled on vaguely about the perpetrators' motivations, as if the ideology fueling a group called the Deccan Mujahedeen was a complete and utter mystery. ("Deccan" refers to a historic Islamic claim on the Deccan Plateau, the territory which stretches between Mumbai and Hyderabad, while "mujahedeen" are Muslim fighters engaged in jihad.) Links to the Pakistan-based terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba added further confirmation and yet still, many of the talking heads remained stubbornly ambiguous. Indeed, the attack was largely presented as if it were occurring in a vacuum.
Perhaps they were taking a cue from last year's Departments of State and Homeland Security internal memorandum forbidding employees from using Islam-specific terminology to discuss Islamic terrorism or the British politicians who earlier this year adopted the phrase "anti-Islamic activity" to describe it. In any case, Orwell would have been proud.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
The Scaramouch msm won't even reprint a cartoon for fear of reprisal. I don't expect them to point the finger at a massacre.
Right here!
I have a good bit that I carry around with me. Do you need some?
Attacks in India are staggeringly common compared to what we see here. The only reason it was even published in American media was because some westerners were caught up in it this time around.
The same place the rage for the attempted murder of seravl Christians in Wissila AK at the Wissila Bible Church when someone poured gasoline around the outside, including the doors and set it on fire.
NO ONE CARES.
it’s all part of the renewing of America now that a Muslim has been elected. There will be no outrage.
seravl = several
sorry
Last MAJOR attack was in Bombay, 2006 - bombs on trains, over 250 killed, barely a mention on CNNFOXMSNBC.
That’s where Pakistan screwed up. This time they killed a handful of Americans and Britishers and a couple of Israelis.
..those folks were targeted & the timing (late night) was purposefully selected so they could be dragged out of their rooms.
It could happen anywhere.
True. The enemy was terrorism, and the phrases "Our Dear Friends, the Saudis" and "Islam Means Peace" were heard coming from the mouths of Our Betters dozens of times a day.
“But if the lack of outrage over the Islamic terrorist assault on Mumbai..”
Aren’t we supposed to expect atrocities from Muslim terrorists? Then why should there be any outrage?
I was in the middle east about 15 years ago, and during the month I was there India had some serious trouble with one religious faction tearing down the church of another religious faction. The whole country went on a rampage, hundreds dead, big news for weeks while I was there. When I got stateside no one had heard of it.
The emasculation of society and men in particular, along with the media disinformation is apparently enough to quell almost any outrage.
**Where is the Outrage?***
Yawn, it’s just Islam as usual. Nothing to see here. Move along.
My personal stylebook still contains the highly descriptive and accurate "friggin' islamic murdering scum."
sorry
I'm outraged.
Except for that of the men who still have their masculinity. But that can be "fixed".
Step this way, the doctor will be with you in a moment....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.