Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

I have a feeling that the SCOTUS is gunshy about getting involved in another election since the 2000 debacle.

This is simply a P.R. move.


3 posted on 12/17/2008 9:35:19 AM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Slapshot68

Or, there could genuinely be nothing to this stuff, as many of us have said for some time. Nahh, that couldn’t be it. USSC has to be corrupt.


7 posted on 12/17/2008 9:38:07 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Slapshot68
I have a feeling that the SCOTUS is gunshy

I think so, too. Note also that the two appeals Kennedy turned down are related to Berg. That may have limited their chances since the Court has turned him down already.

24 posted on 12/17/2008 9:47:35 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Slapshot68

If it is, it is profoundly disturbing. But the course has not yet fully run.

Someone who can match Soros needs to do some investigating of the leads that exist.

Where is Ross the hoss when the nation needs him?


56 posted on 12/17/2008 10:00:34 AM PST by AmericanVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Slapshot68

I guess SCOTUS is just there for PR anymore because they could care less about the Constitution. They are very good recently about protecting the rights of terrorists in Gitmo but useless on protecting the Constitutional rights of American citizens.


77 posted on 12/17/2008 10:10:57 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson