[Kevmo]

Actually, your logic is laugh out loud funny. Your

So, the logical conclusion to draw from your comments is that you are arguing it is not corrupt for the U.S. Supreme Court to base its decisions on P.R.
***Where did I say this, that they BASE their decisions on PR? I didn’t. That makes your “logical” conclusion another classic fallacy of straw argumentation. You really should take that critical thinking class, DOCTOR.

[drjimmy]

Where did I say this, that they BASE their decisions on PR? I didn’t.

As I pointed out, post #3 said this decision was based on PR. That's the post you said did not make the claim that the Supreme Court was corrupt. Are you seriously attempting to argue that saying a decision was a PR move is not the same as saying it was based on PR? I'm tempted to think you're a troll trying to make Freepers look stupid.