History?
Like the way AP in this story lied by omitting the fact that Berg and Taitz cases are still active on the Supreme Court docket. A "history" presented by the Main Stream Media full of lies and distortions about this subject that would make the USSR press proud. Most Americans are in the dark about this issue.
“History” means, very simply, that the issue was just as alive before the election as it is after the election (with those who want to pursue it).
And thus, the voting public didn’t think it mattered to them (at least not the large majority that voted for Obama). That’s the “history” that I’m talking about. In other words, I’m saying that this is not an issue that only came about *after* the election. It was there, already, before the election.
And it’s *this kind of history* that tells me that no one is going to be “after Congress” to do something about Obama... (as you were saying is going to happen if Congress ignores this issue). Hey! A large majority of the voting public has *already* ignored the issue (according to your views on it). Therefore, where are the extra people going to come from who demand that Congress be “thrown out”?? They are not there...