Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pontiac
But I was thinking of Hitler’s contemporaries and as to why the western liberal press considered him a monster.

I think that if there had been no photos of the camps and fewer witnesses that the media would be ignoring it today.

The pictures are so horrific, and there are so many personal accounts out there that the media HAS to be on the record as denouncing it. Otherwise they'd been seen as approving.

35 posted on 12/17/2008 4:37:32 AM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Dianna

There are photos of the gulags in Russia that are ignored. One of FDR’s VPs even saw them firsthand and said nothing.


43 posted on 12/17/2008 7:25:37 AM PST by weegee ("Let Me Just Cut You Off, Because I Don't Want You To Waste Your Question" - B.Obama Dec 16, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Dianna
The pictures are so horrific,

True.

Even more horrific are the films, that are rarely ever seen, that Eisenhower had made (I think they were shot by a famous Hollywood director, Can’t remember the name).

They had the power to really upset you. Maybe why they are not shown, they are truly disturbing.

47 posted on 12/17/2008 5:40:32 PM PST by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson