Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mass55th

I’m not trashing retirement plans in general. But some are more lucrative than others. That is fine when the company, or state, or whatever entity can continue to pay for it. BUT, when they ask the taxpayers to pay more taxes to cover it (or they ask for a “bailout from the taxpayers), it becomes a problem. I am simply saying there never seems to be any discussion of making adjustments to retirement benefits, just raising taxes to pay for them.


60 posted on 12/17/2008 4:26:50 AM PST by REPANDPROUDOFIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: REPANDPROUDOFIT
"I’m not trashing retirement plans in general. But some are more lucrative than others. "

New York State pensions rates are based on your highest three consecutive years' earnings. They also have several different retirement options you can choose from when you retire, as to how you want to receive your money. I chose the reduced pension option, so that if I die within 15 years of my retirement (I've got five down so far), whatever is left in my pension fund, will be equally divided between my two sons. Since longevity doesn't run in my family (I'm 61, my father died at 72, my mother at 69, my brother at 51), I thought this option was the best so that the state wouldn't get all the money I had mandatorily "donated" each payday. I figured it was better to take a smaller pension check each month, than let the state have what was left if I ended up dying within that 15 years.

64 posted on 12/17/2008 7:54:08 AM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson