Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kaehurowing

I have to ask the question: why is there a bar in the first place? Is it not just another way to restrict membership and drive up wages, just like unions and all forms of licensing? And for those of you who think the law is special and must not be left to the caprices of the market, do closed shops generally produce the most vital and impressive labor markets? Here’s a better question: did we ever leave the Dark Ages?


7 posted on 12/16/2008 10:50:16 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane

No, that’s what the bar used to be like. In my state, we had a private voluntary bar that was basically forcibly taken over by the Supreme Court about 20 years ago, and transformed into a government organization for keeping attorneys in line.

I had no problem with the bar as a union, but it doesn’t function that way any more. A perfect example is out of state competition. Our state does nothing to stop it, even though it is illegal for someone not admitted to practice in the state to practice law, and yet continually puts more and more red tape on lawyers who are admitted to practice in the state.

As a result, most of the high-paying legal work is now done by out of state lawyers in places like New York and L.A., not by local attorneys.


9 posted on 12/16/2008 11:07:22 AM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson