Fraudulent "Credit Crisis" Paves Way for Economic Disaster

Accuracy in media ^ | December 15, 2008 | Cliff Kincaid

[exnavy]

If the american people could ever get their collective heads pulled out of that dark cavity, could you just imagine the effect of two million emails to the Washington city demanding the heads of these two treasonists?

[EternalVigilance]

I hate to have to break it to you, but they don’t read emails in Washington. Electronic messages from plebes like us almost entirely go into a black hole, never to be heard from again.

[norraad]

slippery slope...,

..if they say you can afford it, you can't!

I'm havin' a ball just livin' the way my grandparents did, cash, cash , cash, and that's all.

With no manufacturing ,etc., our economy is designed to expand only with credit.

Could be much of the media stats. don't include the fact that many of us "are' "just living this way, and "they" don't like it.

[Petronski]

The article is free.

I'm not talking about the article, I'm talking about the report.

The article is shilling the report, where's the free link to the report?

[EternalVigilance]

I have no idea. I thought the article was important enough on its own, and think every American should read it, as I said. That’s why I encouraged folks to read it, and not just the excerpt that it was possible to post under FR’s posting guidelines.

[Petronski]

The article lists the conclusion(s) of analysis one must pay to see, making it an advertisement for that analysis (also known as SPAM).

Are you in a position to profit from the sale of that analysis? Are you acting on behalf of someone who is?

[EternalVigilance]

No. Are you one of their business competitors?

[Petronski]

Nope. I just know spam when I see it.

[EternalVigilance]

Fine. Don’t buy their report. I know I won’t. I didn’t even notice they were charging for it until you brought it up. But I still like the article, which describes the contents of the report, and think every American should read it. It helps confirm what many of us suspected all along: That the “crisis” was phony.

[o_zarkman44]

“Building a massive Olympic complex?”

Come on!! One large project in one city, that has been ongoing for at least 5 or 6 years will not come close to increasing demand for oil that much. China, outside of the few glimpses of their cities is not that prosperous.

[Petronski]

The article is a joke: a provocative drama-queen accusation with no proof (except the pay-per-view analysis).

[EternalVigilance]

There’s at least as much proof as was provided to us by our elected “leaders” before they opened the public treasury to their friends and associates.

[Petronski]

There’s at least as much proof as was provided to us by our elected “leaders” before they opened the public treasury to their friends and associates.

And you think that was sufficient?

[EternalVigilance]

No. But giving away trillions of taxpayers’ dollars and asking someone to read an article are hardly comparable.

[EternalVigilance]

Do you think the “bailout” was justified?

[Petronski]

I am not going to dignify this spamapalooza with a discussion.

I'm only here to put out the orange pylons and post the CAUTION: SPAM signs.

[EternalVigilance]

You already are.

But, in any case, everyone else seemed to take the article for what it is, a confirmation of what we already know, in our minds and in our guts: that the bailout was a socialist sham of epic proportions.

Anyway, I won’t bother you with any more discussion. I have other things to do for the next few hours.

[Petronski]

It’s not an article, it’s just an ad.

A big flabby spammy ad.