Skip to comments.
Harkin [and Durbin] Proposes $10K Auto Purchase Rebate (Get a load o' this!)
KCCI, Des Moines ^
| 1:39 pm CST December 12, 2008
Posted on 12/16/2008 7:29:20 AM PST by newgeezer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: All
if they want to create a demand for PRIVATE PASSENGER VEHICLES,
END THESE ABSURD MASS TRANSIT SCAM PROGRAMS.
governemnt logic is an oxymoron.
61
posted on
12/16/2008 7:55:57 AM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: massgopguy
---yeah---My plan has been to drive it with the title and registration, along with a bill of sale made out to "whom it may concern" on the dash. When failure occurs, get out and hitchhike home.
Harkin may cause me to reconsider---
62
posted on
12/16/2008 7:56:06 AM PST
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: Travis T. OJustice
People in this income category should not be buying new cars! You, sir, are obviously one of those greedy, evil, conservative rich b*st*rds! /sarc
That "Ol' Populist" Dungheap Harkin would be only too happy to set you straight by saying you're oppressing people who are entitled to new cars.
63
posted on
12/16/2008 7:56:11 AM PST
by
newgeezer
(It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
To: newgeezer
You, sir, are obviously one of those greedy, evil, conservative rich b*st*rds! /sarcThank you, sir, but I do not buy new cars. I want to become rich.
64
posted on
12/16/2008 7:57:44 AM PST
by
Travis T. OJustice
(Change is not a destination, just as hope is not a strategy.)
To: newgeezer
The inmates truly are running the asylum.
The Founding Fathers and their generations are amazed we haven’t marched on DC and thrown these bums into the Potomac yet.
65
posted on
12/16/2008 7:59:24 AM PST
by
exit82
(It's all Obama's fault. And Biden is still a moron. They are both above their paygrade.)
To: camle
i see the price of cars going up at least 10K in the near future...Be the first on your block to own the new base-model Aveo from Chevrolet! Only $25,500.
66
posted on
12/16/2008 7:59:42 AM PST
by
IYAS9YAS
(Hey Obama, why lawyer up when you can pony up? Show us your vault copy BC)
To: Old Professer
Are you kidding? Who would sell you a running car for $400.00? I've bought them in the past for pretty cheap money for (unsanctioned) demolition derbies. There's nothing quite like getting half-buzzed with a half dozen friends and smashing the hell out of cars and letting the cops watch, knowing they can't do anything but laugh.
67
posted on
12/16/2008 8:01:40 AM PST
by
Travis T. OJustice
(Change is not a destination, just as hope is not a strategy.)
To: newgeezer
See ... that lady was right ... now that Obama’s elected, the government will pay for gas.
68
posted on
12/16/2008 8:05:14 AM PST
by
sono
(What happens when the Kool Aid wears off?)
To: Travis T. OJustice; Old Professer
> Are you kidding? Who would sell you a running car for $400.00?
I've bought them in the past for pretty cheap money for (unsanctioned) demolition derbies. I'm sure his point was, those $400 cars will quickly cost at least $5400 when this government "solution" is in place.
69
posted on
12/16/2008 8:08:44 AM PST
by
newgeezer
(It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
To: longtermmemmory
I remember Delta and a bunch of others airlines went bankrupt and they seem to be about 95% full whenever I fly. Total bs argument promoted by the UAW and its poitical whores.
70
posted on
12/16/2008 8:12:44 AM PST
by
MarkT
To: newgeezer; Old Professer
I fully agree, and that was my first thought when I started to read this dreck.
71
posted on
12/16/2008 8:14:17 AM PST
by
Travis T. OJustice
(Change is not a destination, just as hope is not a strategy.)
To: newgeezer
“To get the rebate, you would be required to turn in a car more than 10 years old that is still drivable.”
If its still driveable, doesn’t it go right out on the lot and eventually on the road again...doesn’t make sense if this is supposedly getting older cars off the road.
Look for alot more ‘tinkering’ after the bailout.
72
posted on
12/16/2008 8:16:30 AM PST
by
lacrew
(Yup, they're girded!)
To: Travis T. OJustice
“The Sell Fuel Efficient Cars Act would provide a rebate of $10,000 to buyers who trade in a car more than 10 years old for a new American car. “
Well as long as Infiniti has plants in the US, I am all for it.
/sarcasm
73
posted on
12/16/2008 8:16:53 AM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
("Control the information, you control the people.")
To: newgeezer
While all of these bailouts and other forms of welfare for the undeserving are being discussed, heroic men and women in our Armed Forces are risking and sometimes losing everything for their country. They are paid an abysmally small wage and will return to find that whatever money they have saved is worthless due to the coming inflation (due to government printing presses working overtime).
If printing and "injecting" money into the economy is so important, why not give it to someone who deserves it? There are approximately 2 million WOT vets. Giving each one $20,000 would cost "only" $40 billion. If targeting the use of the money is necessary, make it a $20,000 credit towards the purchase of any new car assembled in the USA. But the Republicans might be labeled the "opposition" party for proposing such a thing. It's one thing to risk IED explosions; the wrath of newspaper editors is evidently much more to be feared.
This approach to "stimulating" the economy might mean less up front for the bankers. But they would end up with it eventually (they would just have to work for it). In the meantime, some deserving Americans would receive a very small token of appreciation for their service.
74
posted on
12/16/2008 8:17:54 AM PST
by
Ragnar54
To: newgeezer
Every beater just became a $10,000 car! Idiots! This is nothing but a $10,000 vote buying giveaway.
75
posted on
12/16/2008 8:20:59 AM PST
by
CodeToad
To: newgeezer
They will never get my 73 El Camino, 84 Buick Riviera convertible, 95 Caprice cop car, 96 Impala SS or seven more that are 10 years or older. I will hide them in the woods if they come after them!
76
posted on
12/16/2008 8:24:40 AM PST
by
mono
To: newgeezer
Why is the government trying to encourage low-income people to buy new cars? Our AGI is well over that threshold and one of our primary vehicles is over 10 years old. Even with a $10K “rebate” I’m still not interested in buying a brand new “qualifying” vehicle. I would have absolutely less than no interest if our AGI met the criteria- it seems foolish to me.
77
posted on
12/16/2008 8:25:38 AM PST
by
philled
("I prefer messy democracy to the stability of tyrants." -- Howar Ziad, Iraqi Ambassador to Canada)
To: camle
i see the price of cars going up at least 10K in the near future... No kidding. One needs only to look at what has happened to the price of tuition over the last 30-40 years to figure out that subsidies increase the price of whatever is subsidized. And if you aren't one of those receiving the subsidy, you are well and truly f'd.
Oh, besides the issue of where is the money going to come from? $10K x 10 million cars (over, let's say, a 3 year period) equates to $100 billion. It is far cheaper to simply give the companies $40 billion and bribe the union leaders with another $1 billion to sell out their retirees - then, at least, there will be money to retool and a permanent solution to our lack of price competitiveness.
78
posted on
12/16/2008 8:25:44 AM PST
by
Ancesthntr
(An ex-citizen of the Frederation dedicated to stopping the Obamination from becoming President)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
"The used car market is a good place to be these days."Not so if you own a late-model car getting over 25 mpg - this move would devalue your car by $10,000...
79
posted on
12/16/2008 8:25:58 AM PST
by
Redbob
(W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?)
To: newgeezer
It’s official, the government will now buy the cars nobody wants.
The first model will be called the American Zil.
80
posted on
12/16/2008 8:33:02 AM PST
by
headstamp 2
(Been here before)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson