Posted on 12/16/2008 4:58:45 AM PST by SJackson
At least $600 million in Jewish charitable funds have been wiped out by the collapse of Bernard Madoff's Wall Street investment firm, a partial review by The Jerusalem Post revealed Monday.
Long Island Jewish Medical Center in New Hyde Park. Investors, including the medical center, had more than $24 billion in funds overseen by Bernard Madoff. Photo: AP
Slideshow: Pictures of the week Yet much is still hidden about what may amount to the most spectacular financial disaster to hit Jewish life since the Great Depression, with unconfirmed losses totaling up to $1.5 billion.
Furthermore, the Post's figures do not include billions of dollars lost to individual and family investors, many of whom were the primary donors to Jewish schools, synagogues and communal charities.
The Madoff scandal erupted last Thursday when the 70-year-old financier was arrested on a single count of securities fraud at his Park Avenue home after being turned in by his sons.
Prosecutors contend that Madoff, who is free on a $10 million bond, told employees of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities that he had lost as much as $50 billion in investor funds and reportedly described his operation as "a giant Ponzi scheme."
For the worldwide Jewish community, the fact that the man at the heart of what may be Wall Street's worst-ever fraud was an active member of the community could be the worst news yet in a bad recession period. Not only could Madoff's alleged dishonesty increase anti-Semitic feeling in a time of worldwide economic downturn, said many Jewish leaders, but his close involvement with the Jewish community has exposed vast amounts of Jewish communal assets to his scheme.
Most of the Jewish leaders reached by the Post on Monday said they did not yet know the extent of the damage to their own organizations because they were still checking with their major donors and reviewing their investment portfolios to determine their exposure to Madoff's scheme.
Some organizations, however, already know they have been hit, with many of them hit hard. Reports are surfacing that Yeshiva University has lost far more than a reported estimate of $100m. from its endowment fund, though the university declined to respond to an explicit query about the rumor.
The American Jewish Congress also declined to respond to a query about reports that a majority of its endowment has been lost, a loss that would threaten the organization's survival.
Following the closure of the Massachusetts-based Robert I. Lappin Charitable Foundation and the dramatic overnight disappearance of the much larger Chais Family Foundation, these reports do not bode well for a community that has yet to catch its breath amid an avalanche of bad news.
"It's a major massive shock to the philanthropic system. You have organizations that may not be viable entities without the resources that would have come either directly from endowments or from significant donors," said Sandy Cardin, president of the Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation, which, he said, did not take a hit from the collapse.
Among the major losses announced over the weekend, the Los Angeles Jewish Community Fund reported that its $25.5m. investment in Madoff's firm had disappeared, the Carl and Ruth Shapiro Family Foundation may have lost as much as $145m., while the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, had some $6m. in funds invested with Madoff's firm.
Contradicting rumors that the UJA Federation of New York had taken a significant hit as well, spokeswoman Jane Rubinstein said the federation had "no exposure" to Madoff directly and did not believe that any of its funds had been reinvested with Madoff through third-party money managers.
"This is a tidal wave, a tsunami," said a veteran advisor to Jewish nonprofits, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "You can live with a downturn in the economy, because there will be an upturn. But now we're talking about foundations that have been wiped out completely, money that's not recoverable."
Though observers agree it is still too early to ascertain the full extent of the damage, some estimates expect a 20 percent reduction in funding for US Jewish federations. The cutbacks are expected to hit educational and Israel programs first as the federations work to keep their local charity efforts going.
"People who are starving are going to have to continue to be fed," Avraham Infeld, president of the collapsed Chais Family Foundation, told the Post on Monday. "That means every other kind of Jewish expenditure is going to have to move aside in order to allow welfare to take place for the aged and the poor."
According to Infeld, "this is probably the hardest financial hit ever for the Jewish community. There will be major mergers, cutbacks, and once-and-for-all removal of duplications in the organizations. Why do I need both the Jewish Agency and the Joint [Distribution Committee] today?"
The loss of billions of dollars to Jewish life already hit hard by a worsening recession will hurt everyone, said Infeld.
"I don't think there will be a single institution of Jewish life that will go unaffected. Nobody can sit by the side and say 'this will pass.' It's not going to pass."
The Madoff crisis marked an unprecedented loss to the "Jewish economy" - the networks of Jewish institutions, donors and charities that include universities, schools, hospitals and community centers, agreed Jonathan Sarna, a scholar of American Jewish history at Brandeis University.
"I know of nothing [in history] on this scale," he said.
Sarna predicted that the wholesale destruction of fortunes and endowments would prove to be a turning point in American Jewish institutional life, which over the past 20 years has moved from a model of community funding - collecting small donations from a broad swath of donors - to focusing on a handful of "cowboy" mega-donors who launched hugely successful programs like birthright Israel outside of the traditional federation system.
"The reduction of billions - not millions but billions - in the Jewish economy means that there is just not going to be enough money to sustain all the institutions and initiatives that have been created," Sarna told the Post.
"We will be a poorer community for that. What's been wiped out is an infrastructure that was particularly important in sustaining these institutions. The people who were invested with Madoff were the generation that not only supported institutions like Yeshiva University or the Holocaust museums, but that created them," Sarna said.
Slideshow: Pictures of the week Older donors from Florida's Palm Beach community, where Madoff found many of his investors, might be replaced by a younger generation of Jews whose wealth was invested elsewhere, Sarna speculated.
"It's a different group of people who will be called on to step in. It's almost impossible to imagine that the group that has lost so much money will regain it," he said.
The challenge facing American Jewry will be saving programs and institutions that provide "the most bang for the buck," a task complicated by the absence of a unifying organization to take the lead.
"Are these decisions going to be made by the market... or are we going to ask for a communal bailout?" Sarna asked. "We don't have anybody who can act with the speed and the authority of the federal government, and it's going to take time to sort this out and figure out how to make these decisions professionally."
The crisis triggered by the Madoff scandal was amplified by the scale of losses already sustained by nonprofit foundations and individual donors in the stock market over the past three months, which had already left many struggling to meet their budgets for the coming year.
"It's a triple whammy for Jewish and other not-for-profits that are already staggering because their donor base has been so hard-hit by the sharp drop in the value of their assets, and their own endowments have declined too," said Jack Wertheimer, a professor at the Jewish Theological Seminary.
Most of the nearly $20b. in losses already reported due to the Madoff scheme have been carried by financial institutions in the United States and Europe.
As the bad news continues to pour in, some media reports are beginning to question the "disgraceful negligence" on the part of American financial regulators, who reportedly examined Madoff's investment operation several times over a 20-year period without finding any wrongdoing.
"There were a lot of very sophisticated people who were duped, and that happens a great deal when you've had somebody decide to be unscrupulous," said Harvey Pitt, a former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a regulator in charge of monitoring investment funds like the one Madoff operated.
That’s true, more important the compromise in safety.
Might also note that there are levels of corruption that falls short of criminality, which should also be condemned.
So, tough crap for them. "HA-ha." (/Nelson Muntz)
Furthermore, it was hardly a shock to many that Madoff is a 'Rat, because sleaze of a feather flocks together, and the Democrats are by far the more morally bankrupt party.
I wonder if some of these victims will be able to connect the dots and see that their investments were stolen not only by Madoff, but in effect by corrupt, predominantly DEMOCRATIC politicians. Can they bring themselves to abandon their affinity for the politicians who helped to stab them in the back?
Thanks for the support. I am amazed taht some people want no ill to befall those who seek to destroy our country.
Let them feel the love.
Again thanks,.
He was audited in 2005 and 2007 by the SEC, 3 minor violations in 2005, no SEC action. They missed it. Though there's no indication, if Democrat congresscritters were to blame, they get to share it with the SEC. Under the Bush administration. Incompetent regulation is a problem for both parties.
There’s a list of victims in post 35 which I presume you haven’t read. Please let which ones deserve to be victims for fraud or physical violence.
Ping!
Please see my posts #s 37 and 44.
The fact that Lautenberg is apparently the biggest loser in all this doesn’t hurt my feelings.
What did Upchuck know and when did he know it!
He has other issues. Madoff is merely his excuse.
This is not quite a "Bush" SEC. Like many federal commissions, there are five members on it. By statute, no more than three can be of any party. Thus, it has to end up as 3 Republicans and 2 Democrats at present. You can bet your boots that Democratic senators had and have major influence over the Dems who were appointed and now sit on the commission. I don't think that Madoff and his organization would have randomly distributed his political contributions and not gotten some bang for his buck.
Madoff— Bail for him would be out of the question if I were judge. Too much of a flight risk due to him being such a schemer
Plus in jail you have him on suicide watch
This is the executive branch, he runs it. Good grief, he had a Republican House for six of them, Senate either GOP or a one vote margin for six. He's done a lousy job on many domestic issues, regulation of the financial markets is one of them. The fact that dems may have participated in some of the fiascos, like housing, I see no indication at all that any dems were involved here, doesn't release the President from the responsibility of running the government. This is a minor issue, a couple billion, but is typical of slovenly financial regulation.
They deserve to fail because they were just...really stupid.
Part of the problem is a little related to the socialism. Lots of smart (but not wise) people think that they can beat the market. The market has to be broken in some way for this to work and they believe the market is truly broken (since they are liberal).
So instead of accepting the market return, they turn to that special guy who knows what makes the market tick. They don’t understand that if they are beating the market for some length of time it is either unsustainable or a result of fraud.
First of all, when one attains a large amount of excess wealth, the rule of thumb is to protect it not press your bets. It’s sad if people lost everything but if you had $150 million net worth - pay off your house(s) and keep it in T-bills. Maybe you put $20 or $30 million to work more aggressively but by and large you are supposed to keep it safe and sound.
Now there are stories cropping up about people who knew this guy was a fraud for 30 years... hard to believe one could keep up such a charade for so long. So I’m curious to learn some details - as many as possible.
My guess, however, is that this will get settled rather quickly, with as few details as possible getting out. Because I believe that whatever he did was being done by all the market makers. Sure, he did have a scam going whereby he settled his own trades but so does UBS and so did Merril Lynch. What kind of ‘Ponzi Scheme’ did he run, how did he run it? Did he truly just pay off old money with new money, or did he have some other rigged market scams that just collapsed under the larger crisis? Why didn’t he get caught in the crises of 2000-2001, or 1986?
I agree but don’t hold your breath. If the politicians benefit from it then they will protect it.
Most Americans don’t truly understand basic economics let alone finance and how markets work. If they did they might rise up and demand more accountability, more transparency, and more prisons.
People knew he was a fraud for decades? Anythings possible, but look at the list of victims in post 35. Some pretty well respected investment firms missed it, along with the regulators.
As I understand it, this was just your run of the mill Ponzi, pay the old investors with the new money. And the returns he claimed, 10-12% a year, weren't suspiciously unrealizeable historically a few months ago. Ironically he seems to have sold consistancy and safty, not high returns. Smart, that's where the real money is.
So much more to learn. How did he survive previous downturns? Maybe not hit with redemptions. And what's about that unrelated market maker run by his sons? No relationship, I'm skeptical.
BTW, I think this was simply a crime, not a “strategy” used by other firms. IMO the significance of his position as a broker/dealer, how the h*ll did the SEC miss it, they examined him twice in the last three years. Aren’t they looking at assets or trades?
Madoff didn't just hit liberals or liberal institutions. This SOB hit hospitals too. I know that there are conservatives who were fooled by Madoff. I also saw that RAMAZ and its associated Synagogue, Keihilat Jeshrun, were hit. This is arguable among the most conservative private schools in the city. I went there for 3 years and know some graduates. Of 20 graduates 4 are liberal, 6 are unpolitical, and 10 are conservative (although 3 of these are now in Israel).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.