Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pointsal

SIPC on CNBC.. Can give investors up to 500k each...

WHY???


22 posted on 12/15/2008 5:08:58 PM PST by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: demoskowitz

Said his ponzi scheme is considered “a brokerage”

TOTAL BS!


25 posted on 12/15/2008 5:11:55 PM PST by GreaterSwiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: demoskowitz
READ THIS PEOPLE..

Are You Rich Enough to Invest in a Hedge Fund?

The government wants to make it harder for people to invest in these sometimes-risky investment funds.
By Matthew Mogul, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

May 23, 2007

The SEC will soon raise the bar on who can put money into a hedge fund. Not since 1982 has the Security and Exchange Commission adjusted the wealth standards for accredited investors -- those permitted in hedge funds. As a result, it still takes $1 million in net worth or $200,000 in annual income for individuals ($300,000 for couples) to be eligible.

When those limits were set 25 years ago, only 1.9% of U.S. households qualified as accredited investors, and there were only a few hundred funds to track. Today, some 9000 hedge funds exist worldwide, and because of inflation and the rapid rise of newly minted millionaires, about 8.5% of U.S. households qualify. The broader accessibility to the funds, known largely for their volatility, has sparked concern at the SEC that more and more accredited investors might not have the financial wherewithal to withstand potential losses.

New rules out by year end will limit hedge funds to about 1.3% of households by requiring people to have at least $2.5 million in assets, excluding equity in a home or business, in order to invest. The shrinking universe of eligible investors will force smaller funds to shut. The 500 biggest funds control 80% of all assets and rely mainly on institutional investors, such as insurance companies and endowments, for funding. The rest are left to compete for wealthy individual investors. And that'll get much tougher when the new rules take effect.

But close regulation of hedge funds is not likely. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is pushing for stricter oversight of funds, similar to a proposed SEC rule that was struck down by a federal appeals court last year, but his bill isn't likely to pass.

Though lawmakers are interested in corralling hedge funds, everyone from former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to the White House has come out against it. What's more, Grassley's bill would have to go through the Senate Banking Committee, chaired by Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT). The majority of funds worldwide are headquartered in his state, and in the past, he has called hedge funds a "tremendous wealth-creation vehicle."

57 posted on 12/16/2008 5:48:03 AM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife (Pay it forward this Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson