NYT is a terrorist organization so I don’t find this article at all surprising.
They support Communists who waged war inside the US during the Vietnam War and for years afterwards. Either that means they support acts of treason or believe that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.
They are decided pro-Weather Underground and decidedly anti-American.
“Any regrets?”
Anyone still wonder why the Times enjoys junk bond status!
I'd like to stick the modifier "intentionally" in there. Without the modifier, the point applies equally well to us. The USA kills five-year old girls all the time, often because the bad guys intentionally hide behind her.
But we DON'T kill little girls on purpose. In fact, we go to extraordinary lengths to avoid killing them, and all other non-combatants. There is a significant moral distinction there, although the little girls are unfortunately just as dead either way.