It’s sickening, alright. It also sounds like Janet is being sexually abusive towards the girl.
You reap what you sew.
Part IV. Of the Kingdom of Darkness
Chap. xlvii. Of the Benefit that proceedeth from such Darkness
[23] The fairies (HOMOSEXUALS), in what nation soever they converse, have but one universal king, which some poets of ours call King Oberon; but the Scripture calls Beelzebub, prince of demons. The ecclesiastics (LAWYERS) likewise, in whose dominions soever they be found, acknowledge but one universal king, the Pope (JUDGES).
[24] The ecclesiastics (LAWYERS) are spiritual men and ghostly fathers. The fairies (HOMOSEXUALS) and ghosts inhabit darkness, solitudes, and graves. The ecclesiastics (LAWYERS) walk in obscurity of doctrine, in monasteries, churches (COURTS), and church-yards.
[25] The ecclesiastics have their cathedral churches (COURTHOUSES), which (in what town soever they be erected) by virtue of holy water (BAR ASSOCIATIONS) and certain charms called exorcisms (LAWS) have the power to make those towns cities (that is to say, seats of empire). The fairies (HOMOSEXUALS) also have their enchanted castles (LAW OFFICES IN OLD VICTORIAN HOMES), and certain gigantic ghosts (ACLU, SIERRA CLUB, etc.) that domineer over the regions about them.
This is what mutual female carpet munching will get you every time.
This is all about butt-banditry and carpet-munching, and indoctrinating youngsters into the (false) belief that this is OK.
I’d change my name and move to a conservative state like Texas or Montana, before I’d let the Ga/Lezbo former lover (or a hetero former lover), for that matter have access to my child.
And if, somehow, my child was taken from me and given to the former lover, several people WOULD die. I guarantee it.
Never wait for the Lord to sort out your mess.
Never ever wait for the courts to sort it out.
This woman may be “saved,” but she is not saved from stupidity yet, or from the consequences. And she seems to have no clue how damaging this is to her child, despite the references to that. She’s still just sitting there discussing it, as if the media or the public is going to sort it out for her.
Disgusting. There are innumerable ways to convince the ex that this litigation is simply not worth the trouble.
If it were the Father suing for custody, the mother would hold all the cards. Funny how that no longer applies now that a Lesbian partner is the one suing.
"...she believed that she and her daughter Isabella would be safe from her traumatic and confused past."
Didn't she ever, ever watch Soap Operas? The past always comes back to bite you. Actually, actions have consequences and you can't turn off the consequences of your past actions. So, grow up, girl.
Has Janet being paying child support this whole time or is she a dead-beat dad?
Water seeks its own level, dysfunction likewise.
I do not believe a single word this person utters.
I think this ‘couple’ are using everyone to fight a legal battle for the specific purpose of spreading same sex unions/marriage.
Interesting that she mentions not a single word about the ‘child support’ she got the other ‘parent’ to pay.
It seems she wants her bread buttered on both sides. She wants both the child AND the money.
...After their breakup, Miller, the biological mother, moved to Virginia with their daughter Isabella, won sole custody, and excluded Jenkins from the girls life. Millers actions read like a checklist of what heterosexual women sometimes do to the fathers of their children, including: move the child far away; deny the noncustodial parent the opportunity to visit or co-parent the child; make an unsupported, dubious and oh-so-convenient accusation of abuse against the noncustodial parent; and pretend that the noncustodial parent is out-of-line or acting against the childs best interests by wanting to continue the relationship with the child...
...Ladies, welcome to the club.
sigh
What a mess.
I think what's really happenning here is you guys are contending lesbians can't sew? Well, they can't sow seed either! ;-)