Lisa Miller, Ex-Lesbian Fighting for Custody of Own Child against “Civil Union” Partner

http://www.lifesitenews.com ^ | October 27, 2008 | Interview by Matthew Hoffman

[Pikachu_Dad]

I do not believe a single word this person utters.

I think this ‘couple’ are using everyone to fight a legal battle for the specific purpose of spreading same sex unions/marriage.

Interesting that she mentions not a single word about the ‘child support’ she got the other ‘parent’ to pay.

It seems she wants her bread buttered on both sides. She wants both the child AND the money.

[Screaming_Gerbil]

Another view:

In Defense of Janet Jenkins, Lesbian Mom

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/04/16/in-defense-of-janet-jenkins-lesbian-mom/

...After their breakup, Miller, the biological mother, moved to Virginia with their daughter Isabella, won sole custody, and excluded Jenkins from the girl’s life. Miller’s actions read like a checklist of what heterosexual women sometimes do to the fathers of their children, including: move the child far away; deny the noncustodial parent the opportunity to visit or co-parent the child; make an unsupported, dubious and oh-so-convenient accusation of abuse against the noncustodial parent; and pretend that the noncustodial parent is out-of-line or acting against the child’s best interests by wanting to continue the relationship with the child...

...Ladies, welcome to the club.

[darkangel82]

A lot of them go into it for self-diagnosis.

[generally]

This is no longer true. I know of plenty of cases where the male judge, with an ax to grind as a backlash reaction to the situation that traditionally favors women, has granted custody to unfit fathers and taken kids away from excellent mothers. This is particularly a problem when the father has greater financial resources than the mother.

In many places, the legal decisions have little to do with the best interest of the child and a LOT to do with who can afford the most “justice.”

[hinckley buzzard]

In many places, the legal decisions have little to do with the best interest of the child and a LOT to do with who can afford the most “justice.”

No kidding. The "law" will protect the "best interests of the child" when children vote. And the courts will protect "the best interest of the child" when children pay legal bills.

[Texas_shutterbug]

She enters into a civil union, promotes the idea that the child has two mommies, and is surprised when the other "mommy" wants rights?

sigh

What a mess.

[sirchtruth]

You guys are incredible. Out of all the creative spelling I present here on FR y'all decide to notice "sew" instead of "sow." LOL! What is interesting is I actually knew it was wrong when I wrote it. Oh, I looked up, and still couldn't find "sow" and my mind would just not grasp the correct syntaxual spelling at the time.

I think what's really happenning here is you guys are contending lesbians can't sew? Well, they can't sow seed either! ;-)