Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TonyStark

No, the burden of proof is on the person making the wild allegations. I can understand your unwillingness to prove your case, however, as you have absolutely NO proof. Your strawman that it’s Obama’s job to take time out of his schedule to respond to your ridiculous assertions may work on your fellow idiot conspiracy theorists, but it doesn’t work in the world of reality.


221 posted on 12/31/2008 10:41:19 AM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Why do foul-mouthed conspiracy theorists who can't back up their ideas think that I belong at DU?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: WinOne4TheGipper
No, the burden of proof is on the person making the wild allegations.

That's right, like someone who says "I am a natural born citizen and therefore qualified to be President" but refuses to release his birth certificate, passport(s), school transcripts, or any supporting evidence.

The only thing creepier and more pathetic is a boot-licking brain-dead knee-jerk automaton who spends his time (paid or volunteer) mindlessly gainsaying every valid point or question with the same dull attempted redefinition and misrepresentation in defense of his Dark Lord's evasions.

Know anyone like that?

222 posted on 12/31/2008 11:02:14 AM PST by TonyStark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson