The ACLU defends child pornography.
They split hairs, by saying that they oppose the abuse of children that happens in the pornography. But, they say that possessing or distributing such pornography once it as been produced should be protected as freedom of speech. So, once it’s produced, it should be protected under the 1st amendment, according to the ACLU.
Yeah, never really understood that. I mean, I guess if someone has a bunch of regular baby photos that’s one thing. The person is a sicko, but I suppose there’s not much you can do until he/she acts. But anything pornographic or forced or whatever, how can anyone defend that? The creation of it ALWAYS involves hurting a child. Libs disgust me sometimes.
My step father was into this until the government sent him to his new residence.
He was into child rape and produced some images of children visiting his home.
Both him and my Mother are raving liberals who both will defend his actions to this day.
My mother told me that child rape is not that bad. I guess is you match it up to a holocaust it might be slightly less horrifying.
...”The ACLU defends child pornography.
They split hairs, by saying that they oppose the abuse of children that happens in the pornography. But, they say that possessing or distributing such pornography once it as been produced should be protected as freedom of speech. So, once it’s produced, it should be protected under the 1st amendment, according to the ACLU”...
This is vile! How can a nation which claims any measure of freedom tolerate an organization like this for even a day? Their stand protects these perps. The next question is, “Does anyone think this has to do with freedom of speech?” I believe the degrading of life through abortion has promoted this evil. And, yes, the death penalty should be unquestionably the punishment for such activity.
The ACLU is an organization that believes (and practices)
the constitution can be used to declare itself to be unconstitutional!