To: Beckwith
It makes understanding unsubstantiated claims easy. Really “theobamafile.com” isn't a reputable source for U.S. citizenship information.
Where is the actual relevant passage that shows that a “citizen at birth” is somehow not a “natural born citizen”?
45 posted on
12/13/2008 6:57:42 AM PST by
allmendream
(Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)
To: allmendream
You have an obvious cart and horse problem. Why? ... First, the term ‘natural born citizen’ can be understood in its specifics because of the words we have from the framers of the Constitution. No, the definition was not in the Constitution. Many specific things are not in the contract, but the courts have a way to sort that out. At another level is citizenship and the vagaries thereof throughout the history of the Republic. The highest most strict definition is natural born, then comes the conflating crap you seem hung up on, like having the poor horse dragged along by the cart full of obfuscations you prefer.
52 posted on
12/13/2008 11:08:57 AM PST by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: allmendream
Really theobamafile.com isn't a reputable source for U.S. citizenship information.
The Obama File is one of the most reliable sources on the Internet for Obama-related information, and isn't the source of the information in that chart. The US Constitution and federal law are the sources. All of the references are linked to the appropriate Articles and Amendments in US Constitution and related federal caselaw. The chart was constructed and provided by an attorney practicing in the federal courts system.
You're awfully cranky today. Didn't you get any last night?
The Natural Born Citizen Chart
53 posted on
12/13/2008 12:08:35 PM PST by
Beckwith
(Typical white person)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson