Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama says staff is clear of scandal
The Washington Times ^ | 12/12/08 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 12/12/2008 6:16:22 AM PST by paulycy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: paulycy
President-elect Barack Obama said Thursday that nobody in his transition office tried to make a deal with Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich on filling Illinois' vacant Senate seat...

What, specifically, does "in his transition office" mean? Is Rahmbo "in his transition office" when he's at home, on an untraceable throw-away cell phone? Or does it mean "employed by the transition office", whereas Rahmbo is (tentatively) employed in the presumptive (or is that presumptuous) administration?

Parsing can be fun!!

21 posted on 12/12/2008 6:43:31 AM PST by MortMan (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything. - Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Either Fitz is saving those THREE WEEKS of Recordings for Batgaining purposes, or he is covering up for the DEMS.....which is it?


22 posted on 12/12/2008 6:44:15 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: paulycy
adding that he has not been contacted by federal authorities during their investigation of the governor

I'm not sure, but I would think that this would be a huge worry. If Obama isn't a target why don't the prosecutors want to get information from him to build a case against the target? If Obama IS going to be a target in a later indictment the prosecutor wouldn't want to tip his hand by interviewing obama.

Maybe I'm all wet though.

23 posted on 12/12/2008 6:45:11 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulycy
"nobody in his transition office tried to make a deal with Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich on filling Illinois' vacant Senate seat,"

Well I'm fairly sure no one in obama's transition office was trying to buy the senate seat, that wasn't the question. Democrats are really good at answering questions that weren't even asked.

I think he was asked if they had any knowledge of the tainted Governor's attempts to sell the seat.

Oh what a tangled web we weave....
24 posted on 12/12/2008 6:51:04 AM PST by FrankR (“Turtle up”, economically, for the duration of the 0bamanation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

“Either Fitz is saving those THREE WEEKS of Recordings for Batgaining purposes, or he is covering up for the DEMS.....which is it?”

There was an abrupt change after that marathon phone conversation on 11/10. My hunch is Team 0 was tipped off and began working WITH the Feds.


25 posted on 12/12/2008 6:56:23 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

No doubt in my mind - he is holding them out for bargaining chips. I really believe this is a coordinated effort to bring Obama down before he assumes the throne. I think they are taking a very meticulous approach to bring down the whole machine, one piece at a time. They can’t go after Obama yet, but once the pieces of the puzzle start coming together, they will be able to, properly exposing him for the fraud that he is.

If I am correct (hopefully), I tip my hat to Bush and the federal government for one of the best chess games that has ever been played.


26 posted on 12/12/2008 6:57:32 AM PST by Free America52 (I just want it to be the way it always has been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill

27 posted on 12/12/2008 6:59:23 AM PST by paulycy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

so sources reported, I can hear Obama now....I AM APPALLED AT HIS INVOLEMENT. Won’t stick to the O, Where’s the tapes, let’s hear them.


28 posted on 12/12/2008 6:59:34 AM PST by nbhunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Free America52

Bush had NOTHING to do with this....and I;m not at all sure that Fitzgerald isn’t a huge DEMOCRAT. I have NO FAITH in the GOVERNMENT at ANY LEVEL.


29 posted on 12/12/2008 7:00:28 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

Well that’s a relief! I’m sure glad he cleared that up! I feel so much better because the idiot in the office next to mine told me Obama would never lie.


30 posted on 12/12/2008 7:12:17 AM PST by anoldafvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulycy; PhilDragoo
Phil has decoded and summarized Zer0's response:


31 posted on 12/12/2008 7:32:14 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals or foriegn or domestic terrorists or both?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
In between 11/7 and the Blago conference call on 11/10, there were two reports from CNN.

11/9 - Source: Obama wants Valerie Jarrett to replace him in Senate

"(CNN) — A prominent Democratic source close to Barack Obama confirmed Sunday that Valerie Jarrett is Obama’s choice to replace him in the Senate."

11/10 - Sources: Jarrett headed to White House, not Senate

"(CNN) — Two Democratic sources close to President-elect Barack Obama tell CNN that top adviser Valerie Jarrett will not be appointed to replace him in the U.S. Senate." (Posted at 7:56 pm)

Interesting. Could someone have been messing with Blago's mind? I wonder what time  the Blago extravaganza conference call took place on Nov. 10?

Then, yesterday, it got more interesting -- from Lynn Sweet's blog at the Sun-Times:

Axelrod said--counter to Blagojevich--Obama never wanted Valerie Jarrett in the Senate

 "CAMBRIDGE, MASS.--Contrary to comments made by Gov. Blagojevich--according to federal wiretaps--about President elect Barack Obama wanting confidant Valerie Jarrett to replace him in the Senate, David Axelrod said Thursday that Obama's "preference was always she serve in the White House." Jarrett was tapped to be a senior advisor. Axelrod spoke at a forum at Harvard University's Institute of Politics."

32 posted on 12/12/2008 7:48:55 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: browardchad

See if this update makes more sense.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2147471/posts?page=51#51

Ping me with additions or changes, please.


33 posted on 12/12/2008 8:04:36 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

Well, that’s good enough for me. /sarcasm


34 posted on 12/12/2008 8:05:14 AM PST by Señor Zorro ("The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"--Qui-Gon Jinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

I know it’s an ongoing investigation, but at some point it will end.

Hopefully, the Freedom of Information Act is still available by then.


35 posted on 12/12/2008 9:35:08 AM PST by adm5 (YOU CANNOT FIX CAPITALISM WITH SOCIALISM! -Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: adm5

Perhaps I am parsing words here but did anyone else notice that Obama stated “..no one from my TRANSITION team...” Neither Axelrod or his chief of staff are part of the TRANSITION team. Politalk?


36 posted on 12/12/2008 10:13:19 AM PST by GYPSY286 (Politicians must USE their heads or Americans will LOSE their heads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: paulycy
Good to hear that Obama has completed HIS investigation. . .
37 posted on 12/13/2008 5:31:56 AM PST by cricket (America's Freedom Rings! Thank You ~ U..S.A. Military~/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulycy
So Rahm did not talk to Blago, then?
38 posted on 12/13/2008 5:33:09 AM PST by cookcounty ("A ship in harbor is safe, but that's not why the ship is built." ---Governor Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Indeed, this is costing him money. . .interesting inasmuch that no one has raised the ‘question’ yet, of his financing his refusal to ‘show us the paper’.


39 posted on 12/13/2008 5:36:08 AM PST by cricket (America's Freedom Rings! Thank You ~ U..S.A. Military~/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson