I may not know this, but I would venture to say that in the wild, it would not be the norm among all species, to eat their own. Overall, the cold truth is a balance of numbers, like you just implied, which dictates the allowance of deviant behavior, for a species. Those multiple births in forcibly bred bitches might allow for more cannibalism by the bitch, of its own offspring. If in the wild, the picture might be different.
You are pitifully uninformed.
Regarding dog-breeding, maybe. I'm not interested in it. As for the arguments I made earlier, ha, no!
On one hand you talk about the need to have your genes continue and then talk about dogs being “forcibly breed”. LOL! Silly newbie!
I'll try my best to turn my other cheek (LOL!) and not return the rudeness. Look at it again. In dog-breeding, there's intervention that's not by will of the parties involved. In IVF, the couple wilfully goes to the specialist to get the procedure done. Is that clear enough?
Oh, and irrational threats are so passé! Aren't you skillful enough to make winning arguments? Or have I read you wrong?
Ha, yes. You have used one example of human cannibalism to defend the killing of human offspring. Yet, in comparing humans to other animals, have not given examples of human cannibalism as the norm as I have given examples of this in the animal world.
>>I'll try my best to turn my other cheek (LOL!) and not return the rudeness<<
Fact is not rude. That's liberal think. You signed up for FR in September of 2008. You're a newbie. Fact.
>>Oh, and irrational threats are so passé! Aren't you skillful enough to make winning arguments? Or have I read you wrong?<<
Irrational threats? *snicker*