Replies

None of which were my arguments, so I was wondering why your post was directed at me. Either an oops, or an intentional confusion of our discussion.

I'm tiring of this semantic nonsense. You claimed that I was being dishonest somehow, and I showed you why I included those points that led you to decide to label me 'dishonest'. And now you say that this is outside your arguments.

Frankly, I find your arguments more confrontational, albeit weak, than adding anything of value to the discussion. Please don't be surprised if I choose to ignore you from here on.

And now you say that this is outside your arguments.
It was, I never mentioned embryos, terminally ill, etc. Why should I have to defend someone else's arguments?

Please don't be surprised if I choose to ignore you from here on.
Probably your best bet. I've got you on record as believing murder, rape, and even a little socialism are all justified in the name of furthering one's lineage. I've got plenty more rope to lend you, if you need it.