“Actually the delay was a fair thing to do.”
In what way?
I just happen to believe that we shouldn't be trying to win elections and gain power by prosecuting corrupt (or in many cases completely innocent) politicians just before an election. Unfortunately the Dems don't believe that and are clearly following a path where we will continue to see Republicans "brought to justice" in the months preceding the general elections. It is a bad trend that somehow has to end. I don't know how to do that and it is clearly a one-sided deal.
So in a sense the delay was, of course, not fair - Fitz should have done what the Dems would do and that would be to nail the governor in June and impact the election. The Dems would have done it so why shouldn't we. It's a too bads make a right kind of question. With Fitz, however, the question is moot. Fitz does what is good for Fitz. I don't trust that guy for a minute. You will see that things will work out for him. 99 guys will get fired in January and Fitz won't be one of them.