[mkjessup]

Franken presented on Thursday 62 affidavits from Minnesota citizens who stated that their votes for Franken were improperly rejected. In past elections, such affidavits have all but forced election officials to count the votes in question.

1.) HOW do those citizens KNOW their votes were improperly rejected? Were they informed by the Minnesota Secretary of State of that fact?

2.) IF those ballots were rejected, why would the grounds upon which they were rejected now be considered insufficient, and the ballots considered valid and acceptable? Were they lying then (about the ballots being invalid) or are they lying NOW (about them now being 'acceptable')?

3.) Franken and the 'Rats are phucking scum. THAT fact is absolutely valid and invulnerable to ANY challenge.

[gocats5]

We must stop supporting Coleman. It is very bad for PR for us to call for legal votes to not be counted.

Minnesota is soo clean, the canvassing board will probably correct the clerical errors allowing all legal votes to be counted. Most likely Franken will be the certified winner.