You are either not paying attention, a keyboard commando naysayer in the RINO “let’s move on” mold or you are an Obot.
Berg’s case was expected to be tossed. Leo’s case was messy due to fraud in NJ and Cort’s case (essentially written by Leo) was stronger than Leo’s (first) case.
If Scalia had felt Cort’s case was just a rehash of Leo’s - it would have never been scheduled for the full court tomorrow. Leo and others think Scalia and possibly Thomas felt Cort’s case was cleaner and stronger than Leo’s (first) case. Leo had little time to write up the first case. His second attempt in Cort’s case is much better.
You're kidding me, right?
The next time you say something this stupid, newbie, you should first check my fairly lengthy posting history.