Again...it is completely viable that the virgin Mary....errrr....Stanley Ann Dunham, had a foreign birth, legally registered it in Hawaii, and then the STATE (who, you correctly cite as being more likely ‘other party’ than the parents - responsible for birth announcements), released that registration, along with many others, to the local print media.
Why did Stanley Ann go to Kenya to give birth? Speculation, and that’s all it is, and I respect and accept that...but speculation suggests she was there visiting, and was either too pregnant to endure travel or incurred labor sooner than expected, while still in Kenya. The last thing she probably ever thought about though, was that Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Dunham Soetoro Dunham Dunham Obama Soetoro Soetoro Soetoro Soetoro Dunham Soetoro Obama Obama Obama would ever seek the Presidency. And while that’s just speculation, per neatly tucked away Hawaiian legalities, the proof he’s offered to substantiate natural born citizenship simply isn’t complete or viable. And he could easily, easily provide it. Transparency? Unity? Where....? I don’t see it...and seeing so many debate this, you can’t claim to either. That’s not my doing. Or Berg’s, or Keyes’. That’s Barack Obama’s doing.
People treat this like a conspiracy HAD TO exist 47 years ago for this to be a viable question. It didn’t. And truthfully, I’m less concerned about the merit of the Constitution which made sense when it was carved out, but perhaps makes less sense now...but more concerned with a man who may have willfully and knowingly committed such a gross fraud in his unrelenting pursuit for power. I also believe Dr. Polarik’s research is very valid, however I don’t cling to it or cite it...because I am trying to stick only to fact that passed the litmus of public acceptance, long before this issue came up. And per those facts, the question is outstanding. It shouldn’t be. It doesn’t have to be. It is, though.
And I appreciate, providing I won’t post this only to find “You’re just racist, Hank! ‘Scoreboard! Scoreboard!’” posts with your name attached to them...the grounded inquiries you’re posturing. But, from experience, I am still certain...by the time we’re done, you’ll walk away saying, “No way. He’s eligible and proved it already. Of course he was properly vetted. Right...? Yeah. Of course he was. He must’ve been.” People are firm on this. But neither on either side of the debate, actually have room to be. It’s an objective question, with an objective answer, that many debate subjectively. That is the handy-work of a lack of transparency, on this objective matter, by the same person who claimed committment to uniting us.