Thus I acknowledged that there is a distinction between the two right from the beginning.
Thus your continued insistence that there is a difference that I am somehow not acknowledging is rather ludicrous.
My definition of a “natural born citizen” is that one is a citizen AT BIRTH; i.e. not a “naturalized citizen”. Every U.S. citizen is either one or the other.
And your definition is not the author's definition, nor mine.
That is what I have attempted to help you understand, but you clearly do not want to grasp.
It's no threat to acknowledge opposing viewpoints, which is what you're refusing to do.
You will remain completely confused about several of these lawsuits, as a result. But, I'm done trying to elucidate you.
Have a good day.