I never said there was no difference. In fact a gave a specific example of a U.S. citizen who is not a “natural born citizen” and thus would be ineligible to serve as President; namely my Governor.
I repeat to you. Engage what I said, not what you wish I said, wanted me to say or thought I said.
A natural born citizen means a citizen at birth, rather than a naturalized citizen.
No, I do not. I sought to explain to you the contention of the article that is the subject of this thread, namely that the language of the Constitution clearly differentiates between the "natural born citizen" and the "citizen," and that, furthermore, the "citizen" referenced in that language cannot be naturalized, therefore there is a difference between the "natural born citizen" and a U. S. citizen at birth.
Now, if you are quite finished with being rude, I'll leave you in your misunderstanding of the matter, never mind whether you agree or disagree.