Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enchante

I’m with you on thinking Obama and staff may have avoided Blago entirely. They knew he was already under investigation, and probably guessed (at the least) that wiretaps and other means of eavesdropping and surveillance were in place.

Another point is that Blago’s intention was to plant stories that “leaked” false information about the potential candidates, so could Blago’s staff have planted information stating meetings took place that really never did? (With Obama)

Jarrett may have went along with the senator appointment until she got confirmation of a better apointment with the WH.

Too much speculation! Not enough answers!

Bottom line: Many others are involved. We deserve answers and names.


284 posted on 12/11/2008 9:27:34 AM PST by 1Swashbuckler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]


To: 1Swashbuckler

There are 300 hours of tapes. There is a lot more material.


289 posted on 12/11/2008 9:29:18 AM PST by weegee (Sec. of State Clinton. What kind of change is it to keep the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton Oligarchy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

To: 1Swashbuckler

Yes, it’s not that I don’t think Obama and his team are dirty — just that they are more careful than Blago, who is obviously a reckless fool.


290 posted on 12/11/2008 9:30:04 AM PST by Enchante (Was Jesse Jackson, Sr. the bagman for "Senate Candidate #5" -- JJJr.??????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson