Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SZonian
The Canal Zone was a US possession and therefore, any persons born there are US citizens.

If you are born in France (in a French hospital) and your parents are US citizens, you are a US citizen at birth. What's the difference between that and what you described in Panama.

I’m not sure about non-US citizens giving birth while there...

You just undercut McCain's entire natural-born argument. If every single child born there (regardless of thier parent's citizenship) isn't automaticly an American citizen, then nobody born there is a natrual born citizen.

The child born in France above would be a citizen at birth.

Had that child been born in Virginia insetead of France, they would not only be a citizen at birth, but also a natural-born citizen at birth.

24 posted on 12/10/2008 11:44:51 AM PST by Brookhaven (The Fair Tax is THE economic litmus test for conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Brookhaven
Had that child been born in Virginia insetead of France, they would not only be a citizen at birth, but also a natural-born citizen at birth.

The problem being that federal law does not recognize a difference between citizen at birth and natural born U.S. citizen. By law the two are synonymous. The law recognizes two classes of citizen; natural born citizen or naturalized citizen. There is no third category.

30 posted on 12/10/2008 11:54:48 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

See my #60 but I did not undercut McCain’s argument, he was born of US parents.

Regards,
SZ


61 posted on 12/17/2008 5:12:03 PM PST by SZonian (I'm a Canal Zone brat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson