His views of Christian doctrine seem to be that he doesn’t take the Bible literally. Is that correct?
Not taking everything literally is not the same thing as taking it as untrue, or even ambiguous.
You appear to have said he was wishy washy about faith in your first post, then later you said that you never made any such charge. As I said before, you have either judged his views of Christian doctrine by policy decisions unrelated to doctrine, or you have been so unclear in your writing that you left a strong impression that is what you meant. Or (we have a third option now) you meant he was wishy washy in faith in the first place and based that assessment on doctrinal statements but later declared for some reason that you hadn’t been talking about his faith.
Basically, you’re all over the map and seem unable to make any coherent point more intelligent than “Bush bad.” So please, either write clearly or call the conversation dead. You’re getting silly.