Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
One wonders, for instance, why the Bible has been proved correct over and over by archaeological finds if it’s not a book of real history.

Archaelolical finds do NOT support a worldwide flood as described in Genesis ...

149 posted on 12/09/2008 4:49:21 PM PST by E=MC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: E=MC2
Archaelolical finds do NOT support a worldwide flood as described in Genesis ...

1. Go google around and find all the "fictional" things in the Bible that there was no archaeological support for...until they found some.

2. Such a flood would be so catastrophic and move stuff around so much that there would be almost no way to find archaeological evidence of it. It wouldn't be like discovering a town hit by a Mississippi flood and picking out whose house was whose. It would be more like trying to give people back the saltine crackers they lost in the flood.

3. Enjoy: http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers#/topic/flood

251 posted on 12/09/2008 8:27:24 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson