Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ckilmer

Question for anyone who knows:

Are these conferences required for the Supreme Court to reject hearing a case?

From my understanding the answer is no.

It seems to me that it is a possible indication that there is interest in hearing this case if they had already had a conference on a similar case. Why would Justice Scalia bring this case to conference if they had already heard one and had no interest in hearing this case at all?

Just so that it wouldn’t get re-filed to another Jusitce?


15 posted on 12/09/2008 9:38:05 AM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigIf

You said — “It seems to me that it is a possible indication that there is interest in hearing this case if they had already had a conference on a similar case. Why would Justice Scalia bring this case to conference if they had already heard one and had no interest in hearing this case at all?”

Nope, they’re just figuring out how to quickly *dispose* of the coming cases. They know there are more coming and they are figuring out that this is the way to “seemingly” get it heard, but — “Denied!” ... LOL..

They’ve got their strategy down pretty good in the Supreme Court to lay this issue to rest and bury it...

And then you asked — “Just so that it wouldn’t get re-filed to another Jusitce?”

That sounds like an effective strategy for them to *dump* all these cases in a hurry and to not bug them with more “ring around the rosie” type antics...


23 posted on 12/09/2008 9:51:35 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson