To: Riflema
Since, at least the verbiage indicates, this is a “loan” it's not really a subsidy in a strict sense. In as much as other than the big-three in this industry are already weighing in demanding a piece of the pie - most noteworthy thus far being the electric auto industry - there's a chance that conflicts of interest and unfair business practices will at least be mitigated to some extent. As far a minefield.... well, has federal government involvement in a capitalistic venture ever succeeded?
4 posted on
12/09/2008 8:08:23 AM PST by
Army MP Retired
(There Will Be Many False Prophets)
To: Army MP Retired
Yes, but the loan, since it comes from Uncle
must be at preferential terms to those available in the market - else, why not go to the bank as usual?
Agreed, anytime the Govt gets involved in the market, they tend to emulate an epileptic in a minefield.
6 posted on
12/09/2008 8:24:02 AM PST by
Riflema
To: Army MP Retired
It is a subsidy, but, Detroit is not going to build vehicles anyone wants to buy. So, from a trade point of view it is a non sequitur. It is a gift to the unions from Pelosi-Frank. Merry Christmas.
7 posted on
12/09/2008 8:44:20 AM PST by
depressed in 06
(Bolshecrat, when only the very worse will do.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson