Posted on 12/08/2008 7:59:28 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule
Charles Knapp had read about the trial and had a sense of the hangover on campus. But it took an impromptu meeting with Georgias most famous English instructor to bring inglorious history back into focus.
It was one of the first times I was at the university, Knapp, the former Georgia president, said Monday. I was giving a talk to the faculty, and a number of people came forward when it was over. I remember the line moving up and a bunch of photographers suddenly moving into position. Then a lady comes up and extends her hand and an entire bank of flashbulbs went off. I just laughed and said, You must be Jan Kemp.
This was in 1988, two years after Kemp sued Georgia for wrongful termination and exposed academic irregularities regarding student-athletes.
UGA wasnt the only campus where the athletic departments footprint mutated far beyond its ideal size. But the Kemp suit was clear and tangible. It was something people could touch and feel and debate. It became talking point on all matters related to reforming college athletics.
Jan Kemp died of complications from Alzheimers at the too young age of 59. She passed knowing that she helped affect change at Georgia and elsewhere.
Unfortunately, that change now looks like a small clean spot on a greasy factory floor.
An army of Jan Kemps wouldnt make a difference today. Whistleblowers may catch the occasional corrupt academic counselor, or the football coach whose car keys somehow keep winding up in a recruits pocket.
But todays problems dwarf those of two decades ago. Theyre created by hypocritical college presidents who preach academics one day and yield to a boosters whims to fire the football coach the next. They say yes to 12-game regular seasons, conference championship games and late-night bowl kickoffs and basketball tournament tipoffs but no to a football playoff because it sends the wrong message.
Jan Kemp had the right idea at the right time. But the issues were simpler in the 1980s and barely applicable today. Its like dropping an expert on eight-track technology into a digital world.
The days of the $50 handshake and the grade-changing theres a thousand ways to keep an eye on those things now, said Knapp, who came from Tulane following the resignation of president Fred Davison and an interim term by Henry King Stanford. The battlefield has changed. The amount of money involved with everything from coaches salaries to advertising and BCS bowls its really accelerated everything.
In my days, the question was, What are our minimum academic standards for athletes? Now I hear less and less about those standards. Its about the trajectory of athletics in the face of so much money. Its college presidents talking about trying to maintain some semblance of amateurism. I remember when there was no advertising at Sanford Stadium. We had a long discussion about putting up two itsy-bitsy signs on the scoreboard, one for Coke and one for Delta. We had all this hand wringing over the issue before we decided to do it. Now you go into the stadium and it looks like a video arcade.
There is nothing wrong with making money. The problem is, making money surpassed a universitys primarys mission long ago.
Kemp was the voice that screamed, Weve lost control. Priorities are out of whack.
Georgia listened then. It implemented changes. But in the big picture, nobody listened. Or nobody cared.
We should have known what really mattered. The Bulldogs were giving football scholarships to non-qualifiers because of their size, speed and strength. This was reaffirmed when Kemps superior, Leroy Ervin, was secretly taped at a faculty meeting, saying recruits were used as kind of a raw material in the production of some goods to be sold as whatever product, and they get nothing in return.
There was the dreaded opening statement by the schools attorney, Hale Almand, who acknowledged: We may not make a university student out of him, but if we teach him to read and write, maybe he can work at the post office rather than as a garbage man
So much for the mission statement.
Kemp won her suit. She eventually returned to teaching. Some on campus saw her as a pariah, others as a savior.
If you view it through a sports scope, there was some sense of killing the messenger, Knapp said.
Today, unfortunately, the message has been lost.
The big football schools have to decide whether they are an educational institution or a sports team.
Problem is, there's so much money in it, not so much from advertising as from the alums who worship Football Uber Alles.
You don’t see the massive corruption in “college” baseball and hockey that you do in football and basketball. The reason is simple: minor leagues. Players who want to make the bigs can go play in the minors and get paid pretty well for it; those who choose to take a scholarship probably have at least some interest in getting an education.
The solution would be to divorce the sports teams from the educational institutions and pay the players. But I’m afraid the culture of college athletics is too deeply rooted for that to be feasible.
But it's not just the money -- it's the darned alumni. They are football crazy, especially at the contender schools. I think they would storm the University of Georgia campus with pitchforks and torches if anybody suggested such a thing.
I went to an undergraduate school that only pretended to play football, and a grad school that didn't even pretend, so I don't have a Dawg in this fight . . . .
My one and only degree is from Emory, where the student athletes are actually students, and no one cares much about sports. Which is fine with me -- I didn't need to spend four years and incur a ton of debt to become a fan of a football team.
My dad (Law '49) and grandfather (Oxford '00) and my grandfather-in-law (Oxford, about the same time as my grandfather) all went there too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.