By the way, I know many others have made this same observation, but how are the dimwits so certain of the "missing mystery" ballots being 133 precisely. Do we know if this missing mystery envelope ever in fact actually existed? I personally think the dimwits ran this group of ballots twice through optical machine scanner, and now they are off by this double count. This sounds like a favorite tactic & ploy of the corrupt dimwits. Does the recount total for this precinct match the signed in registered voters or do total registered voters show 133 more than the recount totals? Again, I would not trust the dimwits one smidgeon to have altered & changed the number of registered voters in order to create this controversy over 133 "missing mystery" ballots.
Only if the whole precinct were thrown out would the margin by 687 or so.
The Star trib count uses the election night count for that precinct, but the post-recount, challenges-removed count for all of the other precincts in the state.
Clear?