Where are the papers on ID that have been published in peer reviewed scientific journals?
[[Where are the papers on ID that have been published in peer reviewed scientific journals?]]
They are all over hte place- but again- arm yourself with valid coutner-arguments- NOT that ID even has to present in peer review, but they DO- Science isn’t determined by peer review Soliton- many many scientific discoveries were NOT scientifically reviewed. BUT- you will find that ID meets all your self-imposed criterai, not that they even have to- but they do IF you look into the matter yourself. Happy hunting :)
This strawman was debunked long ago. I've asked the same of the evo-cultists and the very best they can do is cough up garbage about a few chimps and plants on Madagascar.
First, there's no way to determine if an origins article has been peer reviewed, because everytime it is so-called peer reviewed it's confronted by evo-cultist lunacy like "That's religion!", or "That's THEOCRACY" and so on. What a joke. Don't demand of ID what OBVIOLUSLY is a joke when it comes to the cult of evolution!
No one can tell us how one would know if an evo-cultist or a creation scientist "peer reviewed" evolution without their name being attached. NO ONE.
Evo-cultists hold ID to standards it won't hold the cult of evolution to, much less string theory, M-theory, multiverse theory.
Your dog no longer hunts.
Heck, your dog is ill.
Maybe I should check on your dog, I don't even know if it's still alive!