If the urns were created consistent with the laws of physics by living beings that evolved naturally, then the urns did occur naturally. That is what science suggests has happened. The other person's belief that the urns were magical in origin is inconsistent with everything science has discovered to date.
[[If the urns were created consistent with the laws of physics by living beings that evolved naturally, then the urns did occur naturally. That is what science suggests has happened.]]
Soliton- It is evident that you are new to htis, so I won’t comment harshly with hte facts that refute your claims. Good luck in your studies, and this is just a suggestion, but drop the a priori accusations- they are NOT objective factualities- they are petty agendist accusaitons that have NO place in objective science. You’ll gain a world of credibility if you learn to word your objections to the actual scientific facts by concentrating on the facts instead of playing petty games by tryign to tear down the opposition by attackign hteir credibilty- Scientists acknowledge ID is a SCIENCE, but it is those outside of science only that try to tear down the castle by throwing cottonballs at it’s foundation- the facts are the castle, the false accasations tyhat ignore the FACTS are the cotton balls=- It won’t ever work, and will just show that a person that decides to engage in such counter-argument tactics just doesn’t understand the actual facts, and has no other recourse but to throw htose cotton balls. Arm yourself with substantial arguments instead of the tired out petty aerguments of laypersons with an ax to grind agaisnt Christians, God, and Creationism/ID.