But science doesn't
ID isn't science and neither is most of their criticism of evolution
[[ID isn’t science and neither is most of their criticism of evolution]]
Solition- you will increase your credibility by being intellectually honest- makiong pettyy accusations that are false won’t help your credibility one iota.
Either prove ID isn’t science, or retract the statement- I’m not itnerested in your OPINIONS on this matter- I am interested ONLY in the scientific FACTS and disciplines, and it is CLEAR from the actual evidence that ID is FULLY SCIENTIFIC. You can either be petty and stick to false claims about ID, or you can actually look into ID and discover for yourself that it is a STRICT SCIENTIFIC Discipline that doesn’t resemble your accusation one bit.
But htnaks for playing. and P.S science DOES work on those objective principles, denying that it does is just silly.
But science doesn't
ID isn't science and neither is most of their criticism of evolution
SUPREME IRONY since the evo-cultists have to enforce their dogmatic view of science VIA the courts isn't it?
ALSO another lesson about what a joke peer review of the cult of evo really is, because anytime the cult is criticized, questioned or challenged, it's "not science".
BTW it's just another strawman along with peer review...plenty of scientists say ID very much IS indeed science:
Scientists from MIT, Johns Hopkins, Princeton and too many others to ignore.