The singularity? See M theory.
What’s your SCIENTIFIC theory to explain the origin of the creator? Cause if you don’t have one, it’s religion. Not science.
Since hwen does a forensic scientist HAVE to explain how a creator arose? Cripes- you people will go to any dishonest length to try to discredit the evidence which refutes your preferred hypothesis.
ALL a forensic scientist MUST do is present enough evidence to show that something could NOT have happened naturally, and that an intelligent agent MUST have been responsible- when enough evidence is gathered to show this, then it MUST be reasonably assumed that an intelligent agent wwas behind the causation of an event or creation of an object. The forensic scientist doesn’t even need to identify the intelligent agent, their only obligation is to provide evidence to show that intelligence is the correct line of reasoning to take.
Your statement is factully false- how about concentrating on the scientific issues instead of stooping to false accusations and opinions? How abotu addressing hte biolgical impossibility of both Macroevoltuion and abiogenisis
“What’s your SCIENTIFIC theory to explain the origin of the creator?” [excerpt]False assumption.