Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Froggie
I knew they would. We are now stuck with a POTUS who just may not be a natural born citizen.

Why would any of us think the Supreme Court would follow the Constitution?

20 posted on 12/08/2008 8:02:07 AM PST by Dustbunny (Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. The Gipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dustbunny
I knew they would. We are now stuck with a POTUS who just may not be a natural born citizen. Why would any of us think the Supreme Court would follow the Constitution?

This has always been about defining something that's never been clearly explained, and defining it in a way that best suits our purpose. If it was clear from the constitution that Obama couldn't be President, then either Clinton or McCain would have jumped on it.

26 posted on 12/08/2008 8:11:10 AM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Dustbunny

“Why would any of us think the Supreme Court would follow the Constitution?”

Seriously, there are 4 strong conservative justices at the Supreme Court. The case was presented and Justice Thomas allowed it to be brought to conference. If Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Alito did not feel this case had merit, then it didn’t have merit.

This case was attempting to create a definition of natural born status, which was not clarified in the Constitution. Not only that, Donofrio was using a pretty obscure interpretation of natural born, which had never been used before. The SCOTUS obviously decided that his interpretation did not have merit. This is far different from failing to follow the constitution.


49 posted on 12/08/2008 8:51:23 AM PST by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson