Skip to comments.
Rice: 'non-state actors' may have used Pakistan for India attacks
AFP via Google ^
| Dec. 7, 2008
| AFP
Posted on 12/07/2008 2:15:36 PM PST by FocusNexus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: DTogo
To: FocusNexus
Are the illegals in US "Non-State-Actors"?
22
posted on
12/07/2008 4:42:00 PM PST
by
ajay_kumar
(Real conservatives in 2012)
To: FocusNexus
"Rice: 'non-state actors' may have used Pakistan for India attacks"
Yeah...sure...uhuh. India should nuke Pakistan post-haste.
23
posted on
12/07/2008 5:31:42 PM PST
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
To: FocusNexus
Dear Condie....
So what, the Pakistani government has allowed the fellows to exist and multiply. Damn them all. End the high jinks...blast them all to eternal damnation.
24
posted on
12/07/2008 5:52:35 PM PST
by
pointsal
To: AmericanVictory
If we cannot name the enemy. . .we are doomed.
25
posted on
12/07/2008 5:54:02 PM PST
by
cricket
(America's Freedom Rings! Thank You ~ U..S.A. Military~/)
To: cricket
Hmm, imho, it’s always been more or less a game of smoke and mirrors throughout the ages. IOW, enemies disguise themselves and use front groups, etc., etc. It’s nothing new.
26
posted on
12/07/2008 6:42:50 PM PST
by
khnyny
("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
To: FocusNexus
"I think there is no doubt that Pakistani territory was used by probably non-state actors. I don't think that there is compelling evidence of involvement of Pakistani officials," Rice said. That may be true. But Pakistan did offer them sanctuary and protection. That's 'involvement' enough for me. Last chance to choose the right before other forces are released to clean out the terrorists. That option will probably have large collateral damage losses of innocent people caught in the crossfire.
27
posted on
12/07/2008 6:45:03 PM PST
by
esarlls3
To: FocusNexus
The terrorists would like nothing more, than to start a nuclear war between the two countries and involve the US as well, starting WW 3.The terrorists Islamics would like nothing more, than to start a nuclear war between the two countries and involve the US as well, starting WW 3.
Make Mecca like Hiroshima. Problem over. Attack the real enemy for a change.
28
posted on
12/07/2008 7:24:00 PM PST
by
Sir Francis Dashwood
(Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
To: little jeremiah; Indian_Fighter_Kite; Knitting A Conundrum; Hari prasad; MimirsWell; ...
Kurukshetra War - Kali Yuga ping...
To be added to or removed from this ping list, please FReepmail Sir Francis Dashwood.
29
posted on
12/07/2008 7:24:58 PM PST
by
Sir Francis Dashwood
(Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
To: khnyny
Hmm, imho, its always been more or less a game of smoke and mirrors throughout the ages. IOW, enemies disguise themselves and use front groups, etc., etc. Its nothing new.The real enemy is in Mecca.
30
posted on
12/07/2008 7:26:54 PM PST
by
Sir Francis Dashwood
(Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
To: Nathan Zachary
"Allah" be damned, and may the rock god's evil pedophile and mass murdering thief of a self appointed profit burn in hell forevermore, along with this cults followers. The enemy still resides in Mecca... Why the hell can't some people admit this?
31
posted on
12/07/2008 7:30:31 PM PST
by
Sir Francis Dashwood
(Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
To: FocusNexus
Just the idea of Pakistan having nukes motivates a lot of people to start building shelters.
Question: does anyone know if we - or better yet - the Russians - have missiles aimed at Pakistan? If not why not.
32
posted on
12/07/2008 8:21:29 PM PST
by
eleni121
(EN TOUTO NIKA!! + In this sign Conquer! +)
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
It is an interesting question - why can’t anyone say “the problem is Islamic jihad and has been since the late 600s or early 700s and it won’t stop until some external force PUTS A STOP TO IT.
The problem will never go away on its own. Ever. And will assuredly get worse.
Why won’t they say this? Moral cowardice? They’re paid off? Blackmailed? Drugged by the miasma of “moral relativism”? Just plain “piss soaked hind legs” fear? I don’t know.
33
posted on
12/07/2008 8:30:38 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
And IMO the idea of having women as Sectaries of State is insane.
34
posted on
12/07/2008 8:31:15 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
To: little jeremiah
Women are not the problem....liberal women & PC women are the problem. Women such as Golda Meir and Indira Gandhi and Margaret Thatcher were all tough as nails.
35
posted on
12/07/2008 9:13:12 PM PST
by
ajay_kumar
(Real Conservatives in 2012)
To: BGHater
Hoax phone call 'almost took Pakistan to war'That is truly terrifying....
36
posted on
12/07/2008 10:56:45 PM PST
by
ScreamingFist
(Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
To: khnyny
Well, for sure nothing new; but I STILL would be interested in who owns this building.
37
posted on
12/08/2008 7:15:30 PM PST
by
cricket
(America's Freedom Rings! Thank You ~ U..S.A. Military~/)
To: ajay_kumar
Women like that are few and far between. Some women are warrior types, but it is rare.
38
posted on
12/08/2008 10:08:35 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson