Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yaelle

Not exactly.

You are specifically asked if you have loyalties to another government/person/organization, and dual citizenship would indicate you do.

Access to classified information is limited, obviously, and even non-classified information or technology that is restricted due to ITAR is witheld from you, a dual national.

Being married to a foreign national is not an automatic disqualifier. It does make the adjudication process more complicated, as the threat to you is greatly enhanced: Say your wife has relatives in an unfriendly (or even “friendly”) country, and that country threatens the relatives unless YOU give up information. See? You may likely not divulge information, but granting someone a clearance with that possibility must be seriously examined. Being naturalized makes you an American citizen, you have taken the oath. Now, like before, you may be subject to blackmail/threats, so the adjudication process must be carefully done.

Hope that helps.


44 posted on 12/07/2008 11:19:37 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Hulka

Why is security clearance so much less stringent, for those working on code for certain defense systems, then? We’ve been hearing, for years, about problems with Chinese programmers in that area.


50 posted on 12/07/2008 11:33:37 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Hulka
Not exactly. You are specifically asked if you have loyalties to another government/person/organization, and dual citizenship would indicate you do. Access to classified information is limited, obviously, and even non-classified information or technology that is restricted due to ITAR is witheld from you, a dual national. Being married to a foreign national is not an automatic disqualifier. It does make the adjudication process more complicated, as the threat to you is greatly enhanced: Say your wife has relatives in an unfriendly (or even “friendly”) country, and that country threatens the relatives unless YOU give up information. See? You may likely not divulge information, but granting someone a clearance with that possibility must be seriously examined. Being naturalized makes you an American citizen, you have taken the oath. Now, like before, you may be subject to blackmail/threats, so the adjudication process must be carefully done. Hope that helps. Lets suppose a country like India or Israel threatens to send a nuclear missile to Mecca right now during the pilgrimage, how would Obama react? I dare to think his reaction would be based upon his Islamic upbringing. Or conversely what if Iran destroyed Israel? Would Obama retaliate?
55 posted on 12/07/2008 11:46:51 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Americans should lead America, its the right way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Hulka

Right. I do understand. I guess I’ll have to give up any hope of a top security clearance because I do have relatives elsewhere. Shucks.

I think we all knew that Obama could not get a security clearance anyway, with all his Kenyan relatives as well as his buddies who like to blow up things.


94 posted on 12/07/2008 10:22:31 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson