Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharacterCounts

So, in your opinion, no one has standing to see that the Constitution’s simplest provisions are enforced.


646 posted on 12/07/2008 7:46:46 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Don't trust any politician who tells you that their religion doesn't affect their policies...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
So, in your opinion, no one has standing to see that the Constitution’s simplest provisions are enforced.

They way for this case to be properly before the court would have been for one of the Secretaries of State for the various states to refuse to certify Obama's electors. None have. Are they all in on the conspiracy?

I think that if a secretary of State had sued the Obama campaign to produce the certificate, the court would have found sufficient standing because it is that person duty to certify electors.

655 posted on 12/07/2008 8:00:47 PM PST by CharacterCounts (1984 was supposed to be a work of fiction, not a how-to manual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson