“those who get paid to speak and write are mostly silent on the issue”
So they either see it as something like a “silly conspiracy theory” (in which case they disagree with the Supreme Court who allowed it on the docket), or they have some mysterious and exceptional reason for their silence.
In most cases where Rush’s opinion differs from my own on any given subject—which doesn’t happen very often—I consider him wrong.
“...the Supreme Court who allowed it on the docket”.
Well, not quite. Clarence Thomas pegged it for discussion and it will only be “discussed” if other Justices agree to discuss it.
So far, it only merits a quick look, and we do not know for what purpose(s).
Further, we do not know why Thomas selected it. It could be to squelch it once and for all.
Or it could be what most people on this thread seem to want..to shine the light on the issue.