Clarence Thomas certainly has standing with me. But your point is? And Clarence Thomas’ view is?
Clarence Thomas could simply look at the issue and shrug his shoulders, or he could say “Obama, show us the proof.”
Where do you put your money?
Clarence Thomas’s view was that even though Souter rejected Donofrio vs. Wells, he said there’s a constitutional issue at stake. He risked the ire of his colleague. So that signals he thinks it’s important, which it is.
C Thomas cannot say, “show us the BC”. Only the majority of the supremes can say that and have the authority to get it implemented.
Where do you put your money?
***Funny you should ask. I’ve been pushing hard at Intrade to open contracts related to this issue. It’s the biggest thread in the history of their forum.
https://bb.intrade.com/intradeForum/posts/list/2279.page