[sagar]

looks like these poor atheist victims can’t deal with “survival of the fittest.”

Destroying others’ property is not survival of the fittest. If the vandals are shot on the face, then that would be survival of the fittest.

[CE2949BB]

Destroying others’ property is not survival of the fittest. If the vandals are shot on the face, then that would be survival of the fittest.

Now that sounds like a War on Christmas!

Or a war on jackasses that want to believe they are God's Holy Warriors.

[ari-freedom]

“Destroying others’ property is not survival of the fittest. If the vandals are shot on the face, then that would be survival of the fittest.”

The fit protect their property themselves. They don’t complain to the govt.