Will Supremes review citizenship arguments?

Worldnetdaily ^ | 12/4/2008 | staff

[Waco]

If the supremes back away, Beatle Bailey is released from his oath Tues. as are all other oath takers. Let sarge worry about it. Oaths mean nothing.

[Shady Ray]

"Obama was born a dual citizen," I think I understand the process of acquiring dual citizenship, but how exactly is one born with dual citizenship? I guess it means (they think) he was born in Ameirca but had a Kenyan father who was a British citizen.

Exactly. They want you to believe that he just entered the world as a dual citizen, and that is BS. He either was born in Kenya (my personal guess) and acquired citizenship of the UKC upon birth or, if he actually was born in Hawaii, his father would have then had to register his birth at a UK Consulate within 12 months of his birth. Either way, it wasn't some act of UK exerting its sovereignty over 0 without him having any say in the matter.

[Old Retired Army Guy]

If they didn’t have something to hide, they could make this whole issue go away real easy. Has to give one pause for doubt.

[Canedawg]

You have doubts?

[April Lexington]

The conservatives need to become as radical as ACORN and the left. If they can fool the sheeple so can we. We'll fool them into believing in life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And freedom, personal responsibility and the importance of individualism. In short... we will brainwash the foolus publicus into being true Americans!

[Joe Marine 76]

I disagree with the statement: “Obama was born a dual citizen.”

More to the point: he was born either a US Citizen or a British Subject.

By virtue of the FACT that Obama Sr. was a British Subject, Obama Jr. WAS THEREFORE BORN A BRITISH SUBJECT.

Nay?