Posted on 12/05/2008 4:58:36 PM PST by sionnsar
A column that ran in the University of Washington's student newspaper decrying gay marriage and illustrated with the image of a man standing next to a sheep has hundreds of students up in arms. But editors of The Daily are standing behind what they say is free speech.
Organizers of the campus group "Students for a Hate Free Daily" say they expect about 300 people to show up for a campus rally today after more than 1,000 signed up with the group online. The Graduate and Professional Student Senate, meanwhile, passed a resolution this week demanding the paper apologize.
But Sarah Jeglum, The Daily's editor-in-chief, says it's important to have a balance of viewpoints in the paper and isn't planning any sort of apology.
Written by senior John Fay, the Nov. 25 column is one in a series in which both a conservative and liberal commentator weigh in on an issue. Fay argues that homosexuality is an emotional tendency "that needs to be dealt with, not denied."
"Once you've legalized gay marriage, why not polygamy, incest, bestiality or any other form of union?" Fay wrote.
Freshman Kyle Rapinan, who is organizing today's rally...
(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...
Over the years, I’ve come across stories about people pushing for the decriminalization of adult incest.
Adult daughter and father. Adult brothers and adult sisters. You get the idea.
It’ll probably happen, sooner or later.
Yup.
thats what the liberals want
Bahhh!
I think the editor-in-chief needs a commendation for her stand on principle, whatever her own opinions on the matter. If more of today's press were like her, IMHO the press wouldn't be in the toilet laying off major numbers of employees.
Agreed.
Poor girl, she obviously forgot the MSM definition of balance: one moderately liberal view, one liberal view, and one radically liberal view. And if space runs short, drop the first one.
The Graduate and Professional Student Senate, meanwhile, passed a resolution this week demanding the paper apologize.
It makes me chuckle that they've gone to the effort to pass a resolution to demand an apology, instead of just merely demanding one. LOL, socialist collective thinking rears it's ugly head, legislating thought and behavior.
You are so correct!
Sick, but no doubt pedophiles will love this. And why limit it to those who are just interested in sex? Why not something for the groups of people who would enjoy the benefits of married life without the romantic or sexual attachment? Why not groups of friends, 2 or 3 or more, maybe include their pets? It can get pretty absurd pretty fast, yet no doubt people will ask.
The one on the upper right has something that just screams, “milk me! Let me fill your bucket, Big Boy!”
...just before lifting a hind leg and stepping into the almost full pail.
I’ve owned goats. Never again; Osama DESERVES them.
The concept is a YouTubne - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bwoeNYZP_Q
The gays were not at all pleased with this sing-along. I had to disable and remove many, many vile comments.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov35-fAOyP8
Freedom not Sodom!
There’s freedom in America, the land of the red white and blue;
but there still must be laws, things you just can’t do.
You can’t marry your sister, your brother, or the family pet;
a sheep, or a goat - at least not yet!
That how is it with homosexuality, what the Bible calls sodomy;
men lying with men as with women, is perversity!
That they’re not designed that way, tis easy to perceive,
but yielding to sinful desires, man is soon deceived.
A moral wrong is not a civil right; like the sin itself, that’s confusion;
calling evil good and exchanging light for darkness, is sure delusion!
History tells us where this will lead, from societies now in dust,
When a nation casts off the laws of God, and follows it’s own lusts.
Promoting a sin which sends one to Hell from an early grave,
dishonors God and robs man of the Life He gave.
There’s but one answer: the Risen Jesus gave Himself for our sins;
Repent and believe, then truly follow Him!
They do, however, claim animals can't consent to marry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.