This particular one is DOA unless he goes back through the process with a better case.
“This particular one is DOA unless he goes back through the process with a better case.”
I was afraid that would happen. Why, if for no other reason than to end most speculation, did they not pursue this? I guess those of us with doubts about Mr. Obama’s qualifications just don’t count. We are law abiding and we don’t riot, loot, and pilllage because we don’t get our questions or heartburn settled. Therefore, we get ignored. Seems in this world one has to either be extremely rich or extremely violent to get heard. Those of us that respect law and order are treated with contempt.
Heavenly days....what is so difficult about simply wanting Mr. Obama to submit a vault BC to show that he is indeed, without question, constitutionally qualified to be POTUS? If he won’t produce, why won’t the SCOTUS compel him to?
Why doesn’t every citizen have standing to ask this question and get a straight answer?
This deeply depresses me. Not that Mr. Obama hasn’t been tossed, but that question is left unanswered.
Here are some questions for all of you (I know very little about the law):
1. Why can’t a class-action lawsuit be filed on behalf of the American people to force Obama to answer all of these questions? It seems that we ought to have “standing” since, as voters, the citizens participate in an election assuming the candidates to be qualified to run. If they aren’t, it is fraud, pure and simple. We have laws to prevent people from advertising falsely and people get sued when they do. I realize a faulty toaster is not the same as a fraudulent candidate, but in both cases, people expect to get one thing, and they get another. Besides perpetrating the fraudulent notion that he is qualified to be President, he has stolen votes that would have gone to a candidate who is qualified (the Hillary supporters’ argument). The people of the United States have been victims of a massive, massive fraud.
2. For that matter, why can’t the DNC be sued under RICO laws? A quick glance at the Wikipedia definition of how someone or an organization can be charged states that the individual or organization must commit two of the 35 acts. Some of those acts are: bribery, extortion, embezzlement, fraud, theft, dealing in obscene matter, obstruction of justice, racketeering, money laundering, bankruptcy or securities fraud, and bringing in, aiding or assisting aliens in illegally entering the country (if the action was for financial gain). It seems to me that the DNC defines the word “racketeering” (the process of forming or running an organization to operate or commit or otherwise execute ongoing criminal activities).