Check out comment #86 if you want to ruin the rest of your day.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2143396/posts?page=86#86
Repeat my earlier post responding to #86:
Whether he was elected or not, is irrelevant; the people did not _know_ he was ineligible. The DNC and news media hid the information from us.
Further, this the United States of America is not a democracy, where a mere 51% of the people vote to deny lawful rights. Specifically, We the People’s right to a lawful, U.S. Constitutionally guaranteed, President (and other branches). The Supreme Court members need to act accordingly.
>>> The reporter I heard on the msm said that the American voters said he was eligible by voting him in. Now, what the hell does that mean?
>> Check out comment #86 if you want to ruin the rest of your day.
LucyT, I respectfully disagree with your assessment. I’ve heard this elsewhere, akin to a SOS “certifying” the candidate qualification, the ballot, etc.
“Once it’s done, it cannot be undone.” “We can’t undo the will of the people” — I’ve heard that one, too. Don’t believe it. In California, a NON-citizen was removed this year as Mayor because he was unqualified.
Upholding the Constitution is a whole hell of a lot more important than letting a unConstitutionally-qualified person assume the Presidency.
We can’t even get it into these numskull Obots that there’s a difference between a “Citizen” and a “Natural Born Citizen.”
The MSM projects the “truth” they want us to believe.
Just like in Animal Farm, when “All animals are created equal,” evolves into “All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others”
Or better said, “Just because you keep repeating the same Talking Point DOESN’T MEAN IT’S TRUE.”