Skip to comments.
Gun club, police chief indicted in boy's Uzi death
Yahoo ^
| 12/4/2008
| Staff
Posted on 12/04/2008 3:09:36 PM PST by Red in Blue PA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: FMBass
Yeah, you can do some weird stuff if brass hits you in the eye or down the collar. Best to make sure it doesn’t do that as best you can.
21
posted on
12/04/2008 4:57:46 PM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Soliton
"That Uzi empties its magazine in a second. That's 30 recoils in a row in a second. "That would be 1800 rounds per minute. That sounds awfully fast.
22
posted on
12/04/2008 5:43:23 PM PST
by
OldEagle
To: OldEagle
You are right....uzis cycle at 600 rounds per minute...still damn fast.
23
posted on
12/04/2008 5:45:37 PM PST
by
wtc911
("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
To: Dianna
I can’t believe they thought it was safer because it was smaller. Recoil is inversely proportional to mass, you idiots! This micro-Uzi thing is so light and has such a high cyclic rate that it’s hard to think of a gun that would be more dangerous for an inexperienced kid to fire. He’d have been fine shooting a big heavy SMG like a Tommy gun.
24
posted on
12/04/2008 5:48:01 PM PST
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: wtc911
The micro version of the Uzi has a cyclic of 1250 rounds/min or more than 20 per second. It’s one of the fastest little buzz saws made. You barely even hear the individual discharges.
25
posted on
12/04/2008 5:52:15 PM PST
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: OldEagle
The Uzi fires 600 rounds/min...
26
posted on
12/04/2008 5:53:16 PM PST
by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68
Correction : The micro is 1250 rpm...mini is 950 rpm...
Standard is 600 rpm...
27
posted on
12/04/2008 5:58:19 PM PST
by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
To: OldEagle
Bennett said, noting that the weapon has a rate of fire of 20 to 25 rounds per second
28
posted on
12/04/2008 6:25:49 PM PST
by
Soliton
(This 2 shall pass)
To: ccmay
I cant believe they thought it was safer because it was smaller. Recoil is inversely proportional to mass, you idiots! Logical reasoning for people who don't know what they're doing though. Unfortunately, the people "in charge" purported to be experts.
29
posted on
12/05/2008 6:03:11 AM PST
by
Dianna
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson